Skip to Main Content

LEAD101: Global Contexts for Leadership

Marginalized Voices Honeycomb

The Marginalized Voices Honeycomb offers 6 broad categories of sources that can be publishing work on your topic. Fill out the honeycomb with the names of relevant sources that would be engaging with your topic.

Diagram for the Marginalized Voices Honeycomb. In the center is the Topic and branching off from the topic is different types of voices including academic voices, news media, community voices, association and organization reports, public sector reports, and stakeholders and allies.  

Academic Voices  Journal articles, monographs, conference proceedings/presentations, theses and dissertations
News Media Local, community-based, or national reporting. Newspapers, videos, audio, etc.
Community Voices Social media, YouTube videos, podcasts, blogs, forums
Association and Organization Reports Information publicized by associations and organizations whose operations are related to your topic
Public Sector Reports Government publications, publications from Indigenous self-governance groups, social services like policing, healthcare, etc. 
Stakeholders and Allies  Communities, organizations, nonprofit organizations, companies, etc. affected by or connected to the topic 

Created by Jackie Stapleton, Liaison Librarian, University of Waterloo
Adapted by: Aneta Kwak, Mikayla Redden, Jeff Newman, Liaison Librarians, University of Toronto. 
Last update: March 2023

Scholarly (Peer-Reviewed) vs. Popular Sources

When conducting research it is important to distinguish between journal articles and magazine articles. Journal articles are typically referred to as "scholarly," while magazine articles are usually considered "popular." Note that not everything published in a scholarly journal is peer-reviewed; there are also book reviews, editorials, etc., that wlil show up in searches of scholarly journals but that are not peer-reviewed articles.

CriteriaScholarly JournalsPopular Magazines
Example
Content In-depth, primary account of original findings written by the researcher(s); very specific information, with the goal of scholarly communication. Secondary discussion of someone else's research; may include personal narrative or opinion; general information; purpose is to entertain or inform.
Author Author's credentials are provided; usually a scholar or specialist with subject expertise. Author is frequently a journalist paid to write articles; may or may not have subject expertise.
Audience Scholars, researchers, and students. General public; the interested non-specialist.
Language Specialized terminology or jargon of the field; requires expertise in subject area. Vocabulary in general usage; easily understandable to most readers.
Graphics Graphs, charts, and tables; very few advertisements and photographs. Graphs, charts and tables; lots of glossy advertisements and photographs.
Layout & Organization Structured; generally includes the article abstract, goals and objectives, methodology, results (evidence), discussion, conclusion, and bibliography. Informal; may include non-standard formatting. May not present supporting evidence or a conclusion.
Accountability Articles are evaluated by peer-reviewers or referees who are experts in the field; edited for content, format, and style. Articles are evaluated by editorial staff, not experts in the field; edited for format and style.
References Required. Quotes and facts are verifiable. Rare. Little, if any, information about source materials is given.
Examples Annals of Mathematics, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, History of Education Quarterly, almost anything with Journal in the title.

Time, Newsweek, The Nation, The Economist

Adapted from a LibGuide by Beth Rohloff at Tufts University's Tisch Library.